<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <channel>
  <title>LibDig</title>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <atom:link href="http://libdig.co.uk/xmlfeeds.php?id=5&amp;cmd=user" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  <link>http://libdig.co.uk/</link>
  <description>LibDig</description>
  <item>
   <title>Jack of Kent: Is there a WikiLeaks Cult?</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2150/Jack_of_Kent_Is_there_a_WikiLeaks_Cult.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2150/Jack_of_Kent_Is_there_a_WikiLeaks_Cult.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[A good dissection of a story where lack of evidence doesn't appear to hinder allegation making.]]></description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:32:14 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Quaequam Blog! Not dead but</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2140/Quaequam_Blog_Not_dead_but.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2140/Quaequam_Blog_Not_dead_but.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[James pretty much sums up how I'm feeling currently, and actually manages to write it all down.]]></description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:34:27 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Explaining the Lib Dems' disappointing performance in 2010 | Neil Stockley</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2128/Explaining_the_Lib_Dems_disappointing_performance_in_2010__Neil_Stockley.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2128/Explaining_the_Lib_Dems_disappointing_performance_in_2010__Neil_Stockley.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[Not cheery, but absolutely essential, reading for Lib Dems trying to understand why we under-performed expectations in May 2010.]]></description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:40:20 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Has the Observer been conned by the MiliEd campaign?</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2066/Has_the_Observer_been_conned_by_the_MiliEd_campaign.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2066/Has_the_Observer_been_conned_by_the_MiliEd_campaign.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[Mike Smithson points out a seriously dodgy misrepresentation of the results of a private YouGov poll about the Lib Dems commissioned by Ed Miliband's campaign but reported on by the Observer. Perhaps the job cuts at Guardian News and Media have also involved cutting journalists' common sense?]]></description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:33:01 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>We can't all be progressives | Tony Wright</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2067/We_cant_all_be_progressives__Tony_Wright.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2067/We_cant_all_be_progressives__Tony_Wright.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[The Labour MP rightly says his party needs to do more than simply oppose if it wants to win back power.]]></description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:17:10 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Cheap Attacks Could Cost Labour Dear - Adrian Sanders</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2064/Cheap_Attacks_Could_Cost_Labour_Dear__Adrian_Sanders.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2064/Cheap_Attacks_Could_Cost_Labour_Dear__Adrian_Sanders.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[Perceptive piece on how Labour is failing to be perceptive]]></description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:15:55 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Why Lembit Öpik should not be the Lib Dem candidate for Mayor of London</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2063/Why_Lembit_pik_should_not_be_the_Lib_Dem_candidate_for_Mayor_of_London.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2063/Why_Lembit_pik_should_not_be_the_Lib_Dem_candidate_for_Mayor_of_London.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[Two thumbs up.]]></description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:15:31 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Joe's Extra Bold Blog: And Labour's cuts begin</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2059/Joes_Extra_Bold_Blog_And_Labours_cuts_begin.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2059/Joes_Extra_Bold_Blog_And_Labours_cuts_begin.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[No, that's not a typo - and do click through on the link Joe provides to a graph blogged by Ben Goldacre]]></description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:17:47 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Ken Clarke:'Don't send as many criminals to prison' | Mail</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2047/Ken_ClarkeDont_send_as_many_criminals_to_prison__Mail.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2047/Ken_ClarkeDont_send_as_many_criminals_to_prison__Mail.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[Usual story about tabloid laying in to Cabinet minister for suggesting that locking up lots of people for short periods of time isn't the best approach ... except that this time it's a Conservative.]]></description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:31:38 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>White Paper: How digital engagement can save councils money</title>
   <link>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2046/White_Paper_How_digital_engagement_can_save_councils_money.html</link>
   <guid>http://libdig.co.uk/stories/2046/White_Paper_How_digital_engagement_can_save_councils_money.html</guid>
   <description><![CDATA[Short but thought-provoking work from The Democratic Society]]></description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:25:31 +0100</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>